Go Open – Richard Stallman Part 1 Full Interview

Author: admin  //  Category: free software

Richard M. Stallman is the founder of the GNU Project, launched in 1984 to develop
the free software operating system GNU. The name “GNU” is a recursive acronym
for “GNU’s Not Unix”. GNU is free software: everyone is free to copy it and
redistribute it, as well as to make changes either large or small. Non-free software
keeps users divided and helpless, forbidden to share it and unable to change it.
A free operating system is essential for people to be able to use computers in
freedom. Today, Linux-based variants of the GNU system, based on the kernel Linux
developed by Linus Torvalds, are in widespread use. There are estimated to be
some 20 million users of GNU/Linux systems today.

Interviewed by Marc Chase

Duration : 0:10:0


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

25 Responses to “Go Open – Richard Stallman Part 1 Full Interview”

  1. rosstripi Says:

    TRUE STORY.
    TRUE STORY.

  2. 1337M4ts Says:

    Money is not …
    Money is not tangible and if the federal reserve stopped constantly printing money all the money would sooner or later end up in the banks because when the banks lend out money they expect to get more money back than what they loaned out. Money could be tangible, but it is not today, as we are using fiat money.

  3. missyoutub3 Says:

    it was a rhetorical …
    it was a rhetorical question little one. clearly its because i THOUGHT beforehand thats who he was.

  4. Glennhall Says:

    Why ask then… ;)
    Why ask then… ;)

  5. missyoutub3 Says:

    obviously.
    obviously.

  6. Glennhall Says:

    You thought wrong.
    You thought wrong.

  7. rosstripi Says:

    @9:10
    @9:10

  8. rosstripi Says:

    @lennartz79 I …
    @lennartz79 I understand where you are coming from, that software is a product. However, it is intangible and unlimited amounts of it can be created. Why, then, should it be paid for with something that is, in theory, tangible (ie money)? Eventually, paying for software might actually cause a seeming black hole in a nation’s GDP and all the money will begin to pool in the hands of proprietary software companies. More or less, it is an issue of conservation of mass and how it applies to GDP.

  9. rosstripi Says:

    @lennartz79 I …
    @lennartz79 I understand where you are coming from, that software is a product. However, it is intangible and unlimited amounts of it can be created. Why, then, should it be paid for with something that is, in theory, tangible (ie money)? Eventually, paying for software might actually cause a seeming black hole in a nation’s GDP and all the money will begin to pool in the hands of proprietary software companies. More or less, it is an issue of conservation of mass and how it applies to GDP.

  10. JannisAdmek Says:

    hä?
    hä?

  11. missyoutub3 Says:

    i thought richard …
    i thought richard stallman was a serial killer?

  12. lennartz79 Says:

    Stallman is a …
    Stallman is a genius, no question about that, but I do not agree with his “free software” principals.
    His comparison to “recepies” and “cooking” and that an operating system therefore should be “open” so you can modify it and share is are over the top. Software IS a product. and you pay the company who made it. Not giving away the source code is understandable. Now this doesn´t mean I do not embrase open source software, I do. I just don´t agree with Stallman on “free software”.

  13. bozzioisgod44 Says:

    I wanna hug Richard …
    I wanna hug Richard XP

    ^.^

  14. aliancemd Says:

    Big thanks to …
    Big thanks to Stallman for his GCC(The GNU Compiler), without GCC Linus where not able to make Linux(or Freax(Free, Freak, Last X of the Unix) how he called it first time :) )…

  15. skydark Says:

    You seem to have a …
    You seem to have a hard time understanding things, so I’m not gonna push you.

  16. KRKahn87 Says:

    And I quote: “And …
    And I quote: “And the internet would be retarded”.

  17. skydark Says:

    Fail?! If it wasn’t …
    Fail?! If it wasn’t for this “Fail” today you would be using whatever the big corporations would have you use and it would be crappy systems all around. And the internet would be retarded.

    Don’t speak of things you don’t understand.

  18. baskus678 Says:

    Yeah right. That’s …
    Yeah right. That’s why this very site and thousands of others use free software to run. Many run on linux and youtube uses mysql for example.

  19. kmav81 Says:

    i trol u
    i trol u

  20. KRKahn87 Says:

    You ought to call …
    You ought to call it the Fail Software Movement. This is such a joke.

  21. johnnylifeson Says:

    You Rule Richard !! …
    You Rule Richard !!!!

  22. statikeffeck Says:

    You’re really …
    You’re really nit-picking here .Clearly he meant that if you don’t have an operating system, you cannot really do anything useful or productive with a computer because it would only do one thing. Basic digital household appliances are an example – computers with no operating system that are programmed just do a few things.

  23. xmagistar Says:

    he’s a G :)
    he’s a G :)

  24. ELChilabot Says:

    “Go Open”… :-\
    GO …

    “Go Open”… :-\
    GO FREE!!!!

  25. EoN604 Says:

    You’re embressing …
    You’re embressing yourself. Computers need operating systems. They don’t have to be as bloated or even in the same style as what we’re used to, but they all have operating systems of sorts – end of story. You fail.

Leave a Reply